WSU Program Assessment Grants

Goals

To promote best practices in program-level assessment of student learning outcomes and student services programs' goals, the Office of the Provost offers one-time funds to pilot, create, significantly revise, or effectively implement new or revised assessment instruments or processes, or to obtain professional development in program assessment.

The 2024 call for proposals is closed. Please check back in spring 2025 for the next call.

Since 2018, 76% of proposals have been funded, with an average award of $2770 per project.

Common project topics:
  • Developing more useful, practical assessment methods or instruments
  • Improving assessment processes to make them more practical and sustainable
  • Building capacity for assessment through professional development and colleague engagement
  • Aligning assessments with changes to specialized accreditation requirements

To get ideas for a project for your program, see the summary of current projects below, read reports of completed projects, watch the grant panel videos, or review examples of successful proposals. Reviewing the rubric for evaluating proposals can help you refine your proposal. Contact WSU Sr. Director of Assessment Cathy Barrette with questions or for a consultation about your project ideas or draft proposal.


Congratulations to the 2024 WSU Program Assessment Grant awardees!

(Grant recipients: See the forms page for reporting templates.)

Based on recommendations from a review committee of faculty and staff with extensive experience in assessment, five projects received 2024 assessment grants:

Unit(s) and program(s) Project title and description Awardees

Education

BS in Sport Management, MA in Sports Administration

Bridging the Gap Between Academia and Industry: Aligning Sport Management Education with NACE Career Readiness Competencie

To better prepare students for the workforce and in support of Wayne State’s College to Career initiative, the Sport Management and Sports Administration programs will revise their learning outcomes to align with NACE Career Readiness Competencies. Once revised, they will form the basis of corresponding rubrics built directly into Canvas to streamline data collection for program assessment. The faculty will then use the results to better integrate NACE competencies, assignment, and a digital portfolio into their programs to help students achieve and showcase their career-specific skills.

Laurel Whalen, Tiffany Edgar, Tami Augustine

Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Medicine, and Social Work

Doctor of Pharmacy, Doctor of Medicine, Master of Occupational Therapy, Doctor of Physical Therapy, and Bachelor of Social Work

Faculty Intelligence Meets Artificial Intelligence - AI-Driven Excellence (AIDE) in Programmatic Assessment for Interprofessional Education across Health Professions

Representing five healthcare programs with a shared curriculum that addresses their interprofessional collaboration learning outcomes, the programs seek to provide timely, efficient feedback to their 800 students about their performance on key assessments. They also want to facilitate the analysis of that data to inform improvements to their program but lack capacity for both goals. For their grant project, they will identify and pilot a secure, AI-powered data management platform to analyze their assessment data, centrally organize and share feedback, and use the resulting information to improve student learning.

Aline Saad, Diane Levine, Christine Kivlen, Martha Schiller, Brittany Stewart, Kristi Price

Merrill Palmer Skillman Institute, Social Work

Dual Title in Infant Mental Health

Infant Mental Health: Community-Engaged Assessment of the Infant Mental Health Dual-Title Degree Clinical Training

To capture changes in students’ clinical skills and enhance the program’s diversity-informed practice, the Infant Mental Health (IMH) faculty will conduct focus groups with alumni and IMH supervisors. The results will inform revisions to the developmental indicators of clinical competence. Once revised, IMH supervisors will pilot a new indicators form and participate in a focus group to evaluate the new form, the information it provides, and the process for using it before implementing it fully.

Ann Stacks, Carolyn Dayton, Carla Barron

Liberal Arts & Sciences

BA in World Languages, Literatures, and Cultures

Modern Languages, Literatures, and Cultures: Aligning Assignments with Learning Outcomes for the BA in World Languages, Literatures, and Cultures

Given the recent merger of four BA programs into a single program, past assessment practices need to be revised and aligned to the new program’s learning outcomes. As a step in devising a coherent, unified assessment plan, the project team will lead a collaborative training and development process to devise and then pilot a shared assignment template. The template will elicit a subset of the new program learning outcomes and can be adapted across all areas of the new program.

Silvia Giorgini, Christine Knapp, Cori Peet

Liberal Arts & Sciences

BA in Political Science, Bachelor of Public Affairs

Rebuilding Political Science Assessment through Systematic Inclusion of Student and Alumni Voices

To complement recent revisions to their direct assessments of student learning, the BA in Political Science and the Bachelor of Public Affairs will develop and pilot surveys to annually elicit student, faculty, and alumni perspectives. In addition, they will establish a focus group methodology at three points in the UG curriculum to complement the student survey. The surveys and focus groups will provide data for the programs to enhance student learning and program design.

Kevin Deegan-Krause, Sharon Lean, Emily Reetz